Claim rejected
Out-of-network or non-DSP provider used
Network options only pay in full when you use a Designated Service Provider (DSP) — a hospital, GP, specialist or pharmacy the scheme has contracted with. Treatment elsewhere is declined or attracts a co-payment.
What to do next
Check whether a DSP was actually available and accessible to you at the time. If it was an emergency, if no DSP was within reasonable reach, or if the DSP could not provide the service, the scheme is generally required to fund the care as though a DSP had been used. Ask the scheme to confirm in writing which DSP it says you should have used.
Before you accept the decision
- Ask the scheme, in writing, for the exact rule or code it relied on. A reason code on a statement is not a reasoned decision.
- Check whether the treatment relates to a Prescribed Minimum Benefit. Option rules and annual limits cannot lawfully be used to refuse PMB care.
- Compare the ICD-10 and procedure codes on the account against your clinical notes. Coding mismatches cause a large share of rejections.
- Note the scheme’s internal dispute deadline, and the deadlines for escalating to the Council for Medical Schemes.
Other rejection reasons
Rejection Reversal
Have this rejection reviewed independently
Upload the rejection letter, the itemised account and the clinical notes. We test the scheme's stated reason against its own published rules and the Prescribed Minimum Benefit regulations, and produce a written review with a ready-to-send dispute pack where the rejection does not hold up.
Start a claim reviewLandlodz (Pty) Ltd, trading as ClaimIQ SA
Registration No.: 2024/615543/07
ClaimIQ is a product of Landlodz (Pty) Ltd (Reg. No. 2024/615543/07).
Contact: info@claimiq.tech
ClaimIQ SA is an independent medical aid claim review and dispute service. We are not a medical scheme, a broker or a financial services provider.